Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
August 19, 2011
Image Size
68.2 KB
Resolution
714×476
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
10,844 (2 today)
Favourites
270 (who?)
Comments
19
×
Tan by ArtOriginal Tan by ArtOriginal
HipCurve
Add a Comment:
 
:iconrevpermin:
This I understand.
Reply
:iconsapphirathemongoose:
I can't see the tan in the weird lighting.
Reply
:iconsapphirathemongoose:
Not that that's bad or anything, it's a good start, but I'd add a liiittle more contrast either with your lighting, or via photoshop. :)
Reply
:iconsvothunder:
SVOThunder Aug 20, 2011
It seems DA just becoming a photosharing website..... not an art website. A lot of the "art" that is coming up seems to be just like this one.
Reply
:iconartoriginal:
ArtOriginal Aug 20, 2011  Professional Photographer
its much better than your "art"
Reply
:iconkorni:
Korni Aug 21, 2011  Hobbyist Photographer
@SVOThunder Why then we should consider your "pictures" for art? "Experts" like you seem to be everywhere..
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconsvothunder:
SVOThunder Aug 19, 2011
Is this consider art?
Reply
:iconhagsofthedribble:
Depends on the perspective you're looking at.
I've always found the contours of the female human anatomy beautiful, one of nature's breathtaking "scapes".
By the least, it wasn't taken on a shitty cellphone camera in front of a mirror in the bathroom, so yes, I consider it art.
Reply
:iconsvothunder:
SVOThunder Aug 21, 2011
As I have also... I just see too many of these types of pics... God really took his time with the woman and to see people just to take photos of the money areas...(butt, boobs, and vag) and expected it to be consider "art". I think it is poor taste in it. I see pics that involve partial nude and full nude and are very artistic and very tasteful. I get what you are saying but i dont think it refers to this piece
Reply
Add a Comment: